Monday, November 30, 2009

I had a difficult time choosing a single idea to address from this week's reading because there was so many interesting ideas and areas where the two schools of thought intersected. Ultimately I decided to go with a couple of Barry's points about what feminist critics do.

Barry stated that feminist critics "raise the question of whether men and women are 'essentially' different because of biology or are socially constructed as different". One of the feminist theories that I find most interesting is the idea that sex is a biological fact but that gender is performative and shaped by cultural norms, so that what we in America consider appropriate male or female behavior is shaped by our cultural expectations. Chosen is an action movie and action movies are designed to appeal to a male audience. Clive Owen is the stereotype of a male action star. He is tough, cool, and independent--clearly not swayed by any female influences. This is a genre made by men for men. Even in the few action films with a female lead the heroine is portrayed as being an exception to her gender. She is heroic because she acts like a man. Action films reaffirm the societal construct of male and female behaviors.

Of course Chosen is also a commercial and it's clearly trying to sell a product to a male audience by proclaiming this is what it means to be a man in a man's world. BMW is unconcerned about whether or not any women appear in the ad because in a patriarchal society media that highlights men and caters to men is the norm rather than the exception. The Bechdel Test is a simple rule used for judging female representation in media, the very existence of such a test makes a case for the limited presence that women have in media. Additionally, I would argue that societal misogyny makes it acceptable for women to like action movies-- see Timbre's example of female fans of the James Bond franchise-- while belittling any men who like media that is produced for a female demographic.

I was also interested in the idea that feminism criticism debates the idea of the death of the author and instead argues that "experience is central". I think that this has interesting applications for Chosen. Ang Lee is an Asian American male and in Chosen he's made a film that features Asians and men. This would seem to support the idea that experience is central in the creation of a text. Of course a look at his entire ouvre of work show's that he is capable of telling authentic stories about characters who are very much outside his personal experience but I do think it's interesting to question this idea of the role of experience in creating art. Is it possible for a white male to create a feminist film that accurately depicts female characters? Is it possible for a white film maker to create a story about African American characters? I'm not entirely sure that this was the point Barry was trying to make but I found the idea very interesting.

6 comments:

JASON HAGEY said...

I agree with you, Amberly, that it was difficult to choose a single idea because the ideas were so interesting and I loved how they intersected. In fact, I have to say, it is especially fascinating to see how all of the different theory/criticisms interplay (now that we have been introduced to several). I looked up the Bechdel Test link and I think it interesting that the "litmus" requires 2 women, who have a conversation, about a subject other than a love interest. If the elimination of the "love interest conversation" is necessary because such a conversation is stereotypically female, what would the opposite criteria say of men? It includes at least two men, who have at least one conversation with each other, about a love interest.

Jeff said...

"Clive Owen is the stereotype of a male action star. He is tough, cool, and independent--clearly not swayed by any female influences. This is a genre made by men for men."

I liked your post, especially this part. It sent me on a search for stars of action films.

You're right, but the exceptions make the best characters and films.

Batman in The Dark Knight is tough, cool, and independent, but is compelling because of the emotional torment of Bruce Wayne.

The Bride in Kill Bill is the only female character that I can think of that keeps her femininity (not just sexuality) and doesn't "act like a man." Although I don't think this film passes the Bechdel Test because whenever The Bride speaks with another woman, she is usually trying to kill her and Bill comes up who was at one point her love interest.

Amberly said...

Actually I think the reason the Bechdel test specifies a conversation that isn't about romance is not because these conversations are stereotypically female but because they are still all about the men in the story and not the women themselves. So that the only thing women have to contribute to the story is their romantic interest in the male stars. I'm not sure how that fits into a proposed male bechdel test, it may be the feminist in me but I don't really think it's possible to have a male equivalent at all.

Amberly said...

Oh and Jeff while I agree that Batman is interesting because of his emotional turmoil I find his a problematic example because a lot of his emotional turmoil comes from the severing of his various romantic relationships and so many of the women in those movies are not allowed to be interesting complete characters on their own--instead their primary importance in the story is to create emotional anguish for Batman by dying, going evil, etc.

Jeff said...

That is true. It's hard because the film is about Batman. So everyone is defined by their relationship to him. Action films are often about one. How do you feel about Mary Jane in Spiderman? The same? Our relationship with her still seems to be through Peter and Spidey. Is there another way? What would that be like?

Erika Hill said...

I'm sure that it's possible for a man to make a feminist film (or at least a film that would be liked by feminists), but I'm having a difficult time thinking of one. Even Being There, the film we watched last night, allowed so much for men to be lovable and atypical but was sort of deplorable in its treatment of women.

This is much more adept than my own gender criticism of this film, which started and ended with, "There are no women in this film!"